Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
CEFN CROES, WALES,
Autumn 2004
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Sphagnum palustre, Whinash
7
DEFINING THE PROBLEM
  • Aging generating plant
  • Dwindling UK oil & gas reserves
  • Rising electricity demand
  • No central authority
  • Climate change
  • Inadequate current renewables programme
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
GOVERNMENT TARGETS
  • ELECTRICITY


  •  10% FROM RENEWABLES BY 2010
  • (10GW = 38TWh)
  • -----------------
  • RISING TO 20% BY 2020
  • (20GW = 76TWh)
  • GHGs


  • 12.5% Þ OF GHGs OVER 1990 LEVELS BY 2010
  • ---------------------------------------------------
  • NATIONAL GOAL TO REACH 20% Þ BY 2010
  • ----------------------------------------------------
  • ASPIRATION TO REACH 60% Þ BY 2050
13
MISCONCEPTIONS
  • 1. Wind turbines only generate electricity
  •         30% of the time
  • WRONG


  • 2. Electricity can be stored


  • WRONG
14
TYPICAL WIND SPEED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION & TURBINE POWER CURVE
15
MYTH
  • If we build large numbers of wind farms we won’t need nuclear power


  • WRONG
16
Not beautiful but at least it runs 80% of the time
17
Base load and demand
18
 
19
MYTH
  • Wind farms can provide most of our future electricity supply


  • WRONG
20
"The Renewable Energy Foundation asked..."
  • The Renewable Energy Foundation asked AEA Technology to calculate LFs for the English Regions, Scotland & Wales.
  • They agreed but had to send the results to the DTI
  • The DTI blanked out over 50% of the data as ‘confidential’ before passing it to REF
  • REF have refused to pay the bill
21
LOAD FACTORS 1996-2004
22
Ofgem and Load Factors
  • “......we would like to point out that until recently this was based on generators estimates rather than actual output. Since ROC data has been used the output statistics have indicted lower capacity factors than appear to have been used for the earlier estimates”


  • Gareth Evans, Technical Advisor, Ofgem, to Hugh Sharman,
  •  Denmark 17th January 2005
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
MONTHLY LOAD FACTORS FOR THREE WINDFARMS
12/2003 to 11/2004
(Data from Ofgem ROC Register)
27
MONTHLY LOAD FACTORS FOR SWAFFHAM 2 WINDFARM
12/2003 to 11/2004
(Data from Ofgem ROC Register)
28
MONTHLY LOAD FACTORS FOR CATON & LAMBRIGG WINDFARMS - 12/2003 to 11/2004
(Data from Ofgem ROC Register)
29
MYTH
  • Wind farms (i) reduce greenhouse gas emissions and (ii) prevent global warming


  • (i) HIGHLY SUSPECT
  • (ii) WRONG
30
 
31
How much CO2 is ‘saved’?
  • Wind industry use 0.86 tonnes per megawatt hour (MWh)


  • Ian Cawley MP for Humberside wrote to Mike O’Brien the Energy Minister on 16th Feb 2005 for HAT suggesting a fuel mix figure of not more than 0.43  t/MWh was correct


  • On March 15th O’Brien replied, “…..we agree with the paper that it would be appropriate to use an average electricity generation mix when calculating the current CO2 savings from a wind turbine……”
32
CO2 SAVINGS BY 2010?
  • DEFRA, December 2004. Review of the Climate Change Programme, Consultation Paper, p.42 and footnote



  • “…..[REACHING THE TARGET]…..is estimated to save 2.5 million tonnes of carbon in 2010”
  • -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • 2.5 X44/12 = 9.2 million tonnes CO2
  • From 33,600,000 MWh of renewable electricity
  • 9,200,000 ÷ 33,600,000


  •                                = 0.27 tonnes /MWh


33
CO2 SAVINGS BY 2010?
  • “……..10% of supply from renewables in 2010 would save approximately 2.5 million tonnes of carbon per year if the equivalent amount of energy were generated from gas”.


  • Mike O’Brien [Energy Minister]. House of Commons Written Answers, Hansard 2nd Feb. 2005, Column 929W
34
ARE THERE ANY SAVINGS?
  • “When plant is de-loaded to balance the system, it results in a significant proportion of the plant operating relatively inefficiently……


  • …..it has been estimated that the entire benefit of the renewables programme has been negated by the increased emissions from part loaded plant…….”


  • David Tolley (Innogy plc), Jan 2003, Address to the Institution of Mechanical Engineers
35
ARE THERE ANY SAVINGS?
  • “.....it is worth noting that the Government is committed to reducing the CO2 emissions by 26.5 million tonnes by 2010….. This analysis suggests that the current ‘dash for wind’ could actually make the situation worse”
  • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • RJ Bass & P Wilmot, ‘Wind Power may not be the answer’,  UK Journal of Power, July 2004
36
VANISHING CO2 SAVINGS
37
Typical Planning Appliction claims
  • e.g. proposed Whinash wind farm


  • “……the 27 turbines will generate an average of 207,000 MWh each year, enough for 47,630 houses”.                        (based on 35% LF)


  • “…….…will save 177,980 tonnes of CO2,
  •                  (based on 0.86t/MWh)


  • “over 25 years CO2 savings will be 4.4 million tonnes


38
 
39
MYTH
  • We can’t meet our future targets without a massive wind power programme


  • FALSE
40
TYNDALL CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH
Impact of integrating renewables & CHP into the UK transmission network
by Wu, Jenkins and Strbach, 2002
41
DTI Renewables Innovations Review – February 2004
42
SUMMARY
  • We have a looming problem of fuel supply
  • The Governments answer is ‘all gas and wind’
  • This is leading to the pillage of the British countryside
  • There is hopeless confusion about Government targets
  • Wind turbines generate some electricity 75-80% if the time
  • But wind is intermittent, unreliable and unpredictable
  • So wind cannot replace nuclear base-load generation
  • Wind cannot address the growing gap in electricity need
  • Load Factors are less than developers claim
  • CO2 savings are much less than developers claim


  • CLAIMS FOR WIND ARE GROSSLY EXAGGERATED AND CANNOT SERIOUSLY ADDRESS GOVERNMANT TARGETS


43
CONCLUSIONS
  • Renewable electricity targets should be scrapped as a means of reducing CO2
  • They could be replaced by Regional targets for CO2 abatement
  • This would open up opportunities such as efficiency schemes, local incentives, alternative renewables which would engender a sense of local participation and ownership
  • This would remove the need for the divisive, pointless, and widespread plunder of our countryside
44