The Case Against Windfarms is an authoritive, referenced document written by Dr John Etherington ( © Dr JR Etherington). |
|
Appendix 2. Calculations for Section 16. Comparisons Energy- saver lamps If switched on for just four hours a day the saving of electricity by one 100 W-equivalent brightness lamp would be 80 W multiplied by (4 x 365) hours - 116.8 kWh per year. With one such lamp per home in the Boeing 747 airliner Each aircraft carries a 150-170 tonne full fuel-load which is burned within a 24 hour operations cycle. It combines with a larger weight of oxygen to produce CO2: - Jet fuel contains c. 86% carbon. Thus 160 x 0.86 = 138 t carbon/24 h. This converts by molecular weight ratio 44/12 to the weight of CO2. Thus a 747 emits, on average, more than 138 x 44/12 = 506 t CO2/24h The installed capacity of Cefn Croes is 58.5 MW. Allowing a generous 30% load factor, and also using BWEA’s exaggerated CO2 equivalence (Section 5.), the 24 hour saving will be: - 58.5 MW x 0.3 x 24 h x 0.86 t CO2/MWh = 362 t CO2/24 h Calculating with the more realistic ‘mixed-fuel’ CO2 displacement (Section 5) this 362 t CO2/24 h would be reduced to 181 t CO2/24 h – thus one aircraft would outweigh almost three huge wind ‘farms’! Truck and car fuel consumption A MAN 40 tonne 5-axle truck returned an over-all consumption of 31.9 litres diesel per 100km in a road test report (Motor Transport magazine, An average sized car would consume much less hydrocarbon fuel, emitting, say, 18 kg to 20 kg CO2 /hour. (NEF CO2 calculator http://www.nef.org.uk/energyadvice/co2calculator.htm)
|